Op-Ed

This is a piece I submitted that was published this summer as a “Guest Viewpoint” in the Register-Guard. I am not against assessment, or even standardized tests; I am against their emphasis. I believe they are somewhat antithetical to innovative teaching and learning, and they are a 20th century construct in a time when we should be teaching innovation, collaboration, real-world problem-solving, critical thinking, and personal responsibility to 21st century human beings.

In this school year, 2013-2014, NAEP has again selected our school. They have added another assessment in science, increasing 8th grade Johnny’s potential total to 16 standardized tests.

The Real Cost of Standardized Tests

In a recent edition of the comic strip, “Sally Forth”, Sally’s middle school daughter Hilary asks herself, “Why do schools teach kids to pass tests instead of to actually acquire knowledge? Why must I go through this anxiety every single year?” Yearly? How about every 4.5 weeks.

Here’s a math problem: How many standardized tests did eighth grade Johnny take last year? He was in support classes for both reading and math, so he took one standardized test in each class every 4.5 weeks. In two semesters, he took eight of these “progress monitoring” tests. Johnny was also required to take the Oregon state reading, math, and science tests. If he did not pass the reading and math tests the first time, he was required to take them again. Johnny also took the Explore test, and he was “picked” to take the NAEP test as well.

Eighth grade Johnny’s total: Fifteen standardized tests during the school year.

Determining a dollar amount is harder problem! None of the costs appear specifically in 4j’s budget document. The first tests mentioned, those in Johnny’s support classes, entitled EasyCBM, were developed by the UO and sold to Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, a national publishing firm. It appears to cost $4.00 per student yearly. Every elementary and middle school student, even the most capable in reading and math, takes this test at least 3 times per year. There are about 10,000 students in our elementary and middle schools.

The Explore test, a pre-pre ACT test given to all 8th graders (the pre-ACT, or PLAN test is taken by 10th graders), costs $8.50 per student. There are about 1300 8th graders.

Easy CBM and Explore total: $51,000 and change. Although it may not seem like much to a big district like 4j, testing is big business across our state and our nation and answers are not easy to determine.

For instance, as a tax payer, do you know how much it costs Oregon to develop and outsource state math, reading, science and writing tests? With new tests coming our way, funded by grants from the Obama administration and administered by CTM-McGraw Hill, do you know how much it costs the federal government to fund state grants for these tests? What is McGraw Hill, a large publishing firm, charging?

Big money, big business, politics on a national scale. But money isn’t the only cost.

Time costs. How much time is Johnny involved in taking these tests? Bear with me: District EasyCBM tests for Johnny in his two support classes – 12 hours. Explore – 3 hours. The Oregon state reading test – 3 hours; math and science each – 2 hours. If Johnny has to retake both the state math and reading test, another 5 hours. The NAEP test, given to about 1/2 of the 8th grade population in selected 4j middle schools – 2 hours.

Total: 27 hours, equivalent to a school week minus lunch.

Johnny’s ordeal doesn’t account for the time teachers spend on test preparation during “testing season”, the period of time allowed for the administration of state tests during the months of April and May. Teachers administer sample tests and reteach content and test taking strategies. For all content and support classes, add two more full days for test preparation. Add teacher time to learn how to administer and proctor the various tests.

There is test scheduling. Since all the state tests as well as Easy CBM are online, computer lab time must be scheduled for all students in middle and elementary schools. An absent student? That student will be pulled from class to make up tests. During the months of April and May many schools that have fewer computer resources face a real crunch. If the lab is located in the school’s library, books cannot be checked out and students cannot access the lab for online lessons or projects.

Any administrator can quote rationales for standardized tests: EasyCBM monitors students’ progress; NAEP determines the nation’s educational progress; Explore determines a student’s progress toward future goals; the state test determines a student’s progress toward graduation. There is a great deal feel-good spin about the necessity of each test, but it’s entirely possible Johnny doesn’t feel so good.

Want to know how Johnny does in math, science, or reading? Ask his teachers! Assessment happens every day in Johnny’s classrooms in a variety of ways. The emphasis placed on test results crowds out much of what is truly important, exciting lessons and projects that incorporate innovation, critical thinking, team work, and personal responsibility in addition to reading, science and math.

Maybe then 8th grade Johnny will find meaning and inspiration in his educational journey instead of trying to pass standardized tests 15 times each year.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The following is a Guest Viewpoint article I submitted that was published in the Register-Guard during Spring Break, 2015:

They told us not to tell you. If you ask us, 4j teachers and counselors, about opting out of the Smarter Balanced test, the new yearly assessment of educational progress, we must refer you to our administrators, who might refer you to the superintendent’s office. Each will try to dissuade you.

We can’t go along to get along on Smarter Balanced anymore. We are not anti-standards, nor are we anti-assessment. We are against the way parents, students and teachers are being coerced into something that is not ethically right without being completely informed.

Oregon Department of Education states you have the right to opt out only if your child is disabled or if you have strong religious beliefs. This may strike you as exclusionary, but ODE defines religion as having strong ethical or moral beliefs.

On 4j’s opt out page: http://www.4j.lane.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/4J_Assessment_OptOutFormAndFAQ_2014-15.pdf, you will be warned that your school’s report card may be downgraded if you opt your student out, that property values might decrease due to a substandard report card. If a school has enough parents who think this test is unethical, both school and neighborhood will be penalized. Does this strike you as unethical?

4j warns that some colleges may review Smarter Balanced results for admission. What will Marist students do, since they are not required to take this test? On page one of the site, notice opportunities to take multiple exams recognized by colleges everywhere; there is no shortage of tests.

Parents wishing to opt students out will have to submit their official request forms to the superintendent’s office for his approval by March 30th. What would happen if he refuses your request, or if you miss the deadline?

Spanish speaking parents need not apply. The opt out site and form isn’t translated. These parents must visit the district office. In their spare time, they will be helped by an “unbiased” administrator.

The two-part English portion of the test can take up to ten days at the middle level. This means many teachers will be proctoring a test for two weeks, not teaching meaningful lessons, but ensuring your student adheres to testing regulations. Do you want to pay us to proctor a test for ten days? This doesn’t count math and science testing schedules. Schools have designated an entire month for testing and makeup work.

If you opt out, it is implied that you will be responsible for your child’s meaningful parallel educational experience. We thought teachers were responsible for providing meaningful educational experiences. Is it ethical to ask you, a tax payer, to provide work in each subject, work that mimics the test?

The whole process is designed to dissuade parents and guardians from opting students out of an unproven, unnecessary test, and in our opinion, the district and the state are using an unethical opt out process that makes it daunting, and nearly impossible, to exercise parental rights.

Martha Montgomery
Colleen Young
Stephanie Birmingham
Elle Sabala
Casey Tiemann
Laura Ferrelly
Aura Solomon
Sabrina Gordon